Let's Reminisce: Seeing things that aren't there
How can we explain our tendency to see things that are not really there? The man-in-the- moon, a smiley face on a manhole cover, the threatening grill of a car—these illusions of faces are part of a wider group of false pattern recognitions known as pareidolias.
They’re all mental glitches: We know there’s no face on a manhole cover, yet we instantly recognize the image. The manholes’ eyes even seem to be watching us as we walk by. What’s going on? David Alais, an Australian psychology professor, has come up with an interesting answer.
Humans are primed to perceive faces wherever there’s a mere suggestion of one because in the distant past our daily survival hinged on this trick. Thousands of years later, the human brain still uses that neural shortcut to assess the level of threat in a new situation.
According to Alais, “You have to recognize people right away and know if they’re friend or foe, and you need to know it quickly.” If there are two eyes, a nose and a mouth, there’s a response, he said. The brain is primed to see something as a face, even if you know it’s a cheese grater. This highly evolved face recognition area exists in the brain because we’re the most social species on the planet. So much depends on interpersonal contact and relationships.
But pareidolias aren’t all about faces; they also include animal shapes identified in cloud
formations or scenarios perceived in Rorschach tests. But those patterns are imagined;
they emerge in a slower process of cognitive interpretation, rather than the ultra-fast
matching triggered by the classic face template.
Two of Prof. Alais’s colleagues published a study last year which showed that observing face pareidolias engages the same region of the brain as observing a real human face.
The region, called the fusiform gyrus, lines the base of the occipital and temporal lobes and is specialized for facial recognition. It becomes briefly excited in response to an illusory image but within 250 milliseconds, activation shifts to a different part of the brain, indicating that our perception of the object has moved on, too. We no longer see a face, but a car grill or maybe the head of a mop.
“The brain doesn’t seem to think it has made a mistake,” said Prof. Alais. “Imagine someone looms up in your visual field and you have to work out their intentions. It’s more adaptive to have false positives than to miss a threatening face, because that could be the end of you.”
So it makes sense that we see feelings in face pareidolias. In one study, 17 students were asked to rate the emotion expressed in a random series of 800 images that included a variety of human faces interspersed with illusory ones—on handbags, halved green peppers, cappuccino foam, plastic jugs and mop-heads.
The expression ratings were fairly consistent: A “very angry” human face and a “very
angry” handbag were given roughly the same scores.
The researchers also recognized a known cognitive bias called “positive serial
dependence,” which means that the characteristics of one face influenced the perception of the next one in the series. In this study, the happiness perceived on a human face made the pareidolia that came after it look happier, and vice versa. The angry manhole cover made the subsequent human face look angrier.
It turns out that the brain sometimes sees ordinary objects as human faces with feelings,
tricking us into thinking they’re the real thing, at least for a moment. They’re like the
internet emoticons or emojis we use when typing messages. As basic as they are, said Prof. Alais, “Clearly they convey that very human thing: their emotions.”
Jerry Lincecum is a retired Austin College professor who now teaches classes for older adults who want to write their life stories. He welcomes your reminiscences on any subject: email@example.com